A- de 1996
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero
✓Claimant Alberto Hernandez Caicedo Y Otros
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Nulidad por cambio de jurisprudencia
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
No se decretó la nulidad de la Sentencia T-466/96 proferida por la Sala Novena de Revisión.
La Corte ha admitido que luego de proferirse la sentencia podría caber la nulidad si en el texto de la misma sentencia, no en el curso anterior a ella, se incurre en violación al debido proceso.
Sólo cabría la nulidad si hubiera habido cambio de jurisprudencia y no la hubo.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (20 points)
- No decretar la nulidad de la sentencia T-466 de 23 de Septiembre del ano en curso, proferida por la Sala Novena de Revision.
- CARLOS GAVIRIA DIAZ
- Presidente
- JORGE ARANGO MEJIA
- Magistrado
- EDUARDO CIFUENTES MUNOZ
- Magistrado
- ANTONIO BARRERA CARBONELL
- Magistrado
- JOSE GREGORIO HERNANDEZ GALINDO
- Magistrado
- HERNANDO HERRERA VERGARA
- Magistrado
- ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ CABALLERO
- Magistrado Ponente
- FABIO MORON DIAZ
- Magistrado
- VLADIMIRO NARANJO MESA
- Magistrado
- MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA DE MONCALEANO
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.