JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 28, 1996

A- de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Alberto Hernandez Caicedo Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Nulidad De La Sentencia T-466/96.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Nulidad por cambio de jurisprudencia
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

No se decretó la nulidad de la Sentencia T-466/96 proferida por la Sala Novena de Revisión.

La Corte ha admitido que luego de proferirse la sentencia podría caber la nulidad si en el texto de la misma sentencia, no en el curso anterior a ella, se incurre en violación al debido proceso.

Sólo cabría la nulidad si hubiera habido cambio de jurisprudencia y no la hubo.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (20 points)
  1. No decretar la nulidad de la sentencia T-466 de 23 de Septiembre del ano en curso, proferida por la Sala Novena de Revision.
  2. CARLOS GAVIRIA DIAZ
  3. Presidente
  4. JORGE ARANGO MEJIA
  5. Magistrado
  6. EDUARDO CIFUENTES MUNOZ
  7. Magistrado
  8. ANTONIO BARRERA CARBONELL
  9. Magistrado
  10. JOSE GREGORIO HERNANDEZ GALINDO
  11. Magistrado
  12. HERNANDO HERRERA VERGARA
  13. Magistrado
  14. ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ CABALLERO
  15. Magistrado Ponente
  16. FABIO MORON DIAZ
  17. Magistrado
  18. VLADIMIRO NARANJO MESA
  19. Magistrado
  20. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA DE MONCALEANO
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.